Persoonlijke Frequentiestaat paar 65 C Lambert - K Poelma 112e plaats 50.04%
| Cafe Stadtlander, ronde 1, tafel L-3 |
|---|
| NZ tegen J Langbroek - E Steeneken (66) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 1 | 2 nt | N | = | 65 | 66 | 120 | 183.0 | 81.70% |
| 2 | 2  | O | +2 | 65 | 66 | -170 | 80.4 | 35.89% |
| 3 | 3  | N | = | 65 | 66 | 140 | 169.0 | 75.45% |
| 4 | 2 nt | N | = | 65 | 66 | 120 | 78.0 | 34.82% |
| Gemiddelde | 56.97% | | Cafe Smederij, ronde 2, tafel M-2 |
|---|
| NZ tegen D Bulthuis - D Bulthuis (70) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 5 | 4  | N | +1 | 65 | 70 | 650 | 138.0 | 61.61% |
| 6 | 3  | O | -1 | 65 | 70 | 100 | 178.6 | 79.73% |
| 7 | 2  | Z | = | 65 | 70 | 110 | 153.0 | 68.30% |
| 8 | 2  | N | = | 65 | 70 | 110 | 164.5 | 73.44% |
| Gemiddelde | 70.77% | | Cafe Café Albert, ronde 3, tafel O-2 |
|---|
| NZ tegen J Glansbeek - M Kampschoer (74) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 9 | 3 Dbl | W | = | 65 | 74 | -730 | 2.0 | 0.89% |
| 10 | 3 nt | W | -2 | 65 | 74 | 200 | 186.0 | 83.04% |
| 11 | 4  | Z | = | 65 | 74 | 420 | 195.0 | 87.05% |
| 12 | 2  | Z | +1 | 65 | 74 | 140 | 171.0 | 76.34% |
| Gemiddelde | 61.83% | | Cafe Taveerne Rabenhaupt, ronde 4, tafel B-4 |
|---|
| OW tegen M Vermue - A Hemminga (78) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 13 | 2  | N | -2 | 78 | 65 | 200 | 199.0 | 88.84% |
| 14 | 2  | N | +2 | 78 | 65 | -130 | 103.0 | 45.98% |
| 15 | 4  | N | = | 78 | 65 | -620 | 23.0 | 10.27% |
| 16 | 5  | N | = | 78 | 65 | -450 | 32.0 | 14.29% |
| Gemiddelde | 39.85% | | Cafe La Martina, ronde 5, tafel C-3 |
|---|
| OW tegen E Gnirrep - W Swart (82) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 17 | 3  | Z | = | 82 | 65 | -140 | 73.0 | 32.59% |
| 18 | 4  | O | +1 | 82 | 65 | 450 | 140.0 | 62.50% |
| 19 | 3  | O | +1 | 82 | 65 | 170 | 69.2 | 30.89% |
| 20 | 5  | N | = | 82 | 65 | -650 | 79.0 | 35.27% |
| Gemiddelde | 40.31% | | Cafe Hooghoudt Proeflokaal, ronde 6, tafel E-4 |
|---|
| OW tegen F Olthof - S Velema (86) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 21 | 3 nt | O | = | 86 | 65 | 400 | 128.0 | 57.14% |
| 22 | 3 nt | W | = | 86 | 65 | 600 | 158.0 | 70.54% |
| 23 | 2  | W | +3 | 86 | 65 | 150 | 138.0 | 61.61% |
| 24 | 3  | W | = | 86 | 65 | 110 | 191.1 | 85.31% |
| Gemiddelde | 68.65% | | Cafe Walrus, ronde 7, tafel F-4 |
|---|
| OW tegen R Gerlach - M Mulder (90) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 25 | 2  | Z | +1 | 90 | 65 | -140 | 161.0 | 71.88% |
| 26 | 3 nt | Z | +2 | 90 | 65 | -660 | 39.4 | 17.59% |
| 27 | 3  | O | +2 | 90 | 65 | 200 | 80.0 | 35.71% |
| 28 | 3  | N | -1 | 90 | 65 | 100 | 111.0 | 49.55% |
| Gemiddelde | 43.68% | | Cafe Huis de Beurs, ronde 8, tafel G-4 |
|---|
| OW tegen J Dijk - A Pierik (94) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 29 | 1 nt | N | +1 | 94 | 65 | -120 | 36.0 | 16.07% |
| 30 | 3 nt | Z | +1 | 94 | 65 | -430 | 23.0 | 10.27% |
| 31 | 4  | O | -1 | 94 | 65 | -50 | 72.0 | 32.14% |
| 32 | 4  | N | +1 | 94 | 65 | -450 | 33.0 | 14.73% |
| Gemiddelde | 18.30% |