Persoonlijke Frequentiestaat paar 212 L Ginkel - A Homan 190e plaats 42.22%
| Cafe Hooghoudt Proeflokaal, ronde 1, tafel E-8 |
|---|
| OW tegen H Hiel - H Stegge (211) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 1 | 2  | O | -1 | 211 | 212 | -50 | 139.0 | 62.05% |
| 2 | 2  | O | +1 | 211 | 212 | 140 | 71.3 | 31.83% |
| 3 | 2  | N | +2 | 211 | 212 | -170 | 13.0 | 5.80% |
| 4 | 1 nt | N | +2 | 211 | 212 | -150 | 107.0 | 47.77% |
| Gemiddelde | 36.86% | | Cafe La Martina, ronde 2, tafel C-8 |
|---|
| OW tegen H Dooren - G Dooren (207) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 5 | 4  | N | +1 | 207 | 212 | -650 | 86.0 | 38.39% |
| 6 | 3  | O | = | 207 | 212 | 140 | 140.2 | 62.59% |
| 7 | 2 nt | N | -3 | 207 | 212 | 300 | 211.0 | 94.20% |
| 8 | 2  | Z | = | 207 | 212 | -110 | 59.5 | 26.56% |
| Gemiddelde | 55.44% | | Cafe Taveerne Rabenhaupt, ronde 3, tafel B-8 |
|---|
| OW tegen K Veeken - S Kabel (203) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 9 | 3 nt | N | -3 | 203 | 212 | 150 | 203.0 | 90.63% |
| 10 | 3 nt | O | +1 | 203 | 212 | 630 | 200.0 | 89.29% |
| 11 | 2  | N | -1 | 203 | 212 | 50 | 150.0 | 66.96% |
| 12 | 4  | Z | -2 | 203 | 212 | 200 | 193.4 | 86.34% |
| Gemiddelde | 83.31% | | Cafe Weeva, ronde 4, tafel A-7 |
|---|
| OW tegen T Sixma - G Lelij (199) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 13 | 4  | O | -3 | 199 | 212 | -300 | 10.0 | 4.46% |
| 14 | 5  | N | -2 | 199 | 212 | 100 | 200.0 | 89.29% |
| 15 | 4  | N | = | 199 | 212 | -620 | 23.0 | 10.27% |
| 16 | 4  | N | +1 | 199 | 212 | -450 | 32.0 | 14.29% |
| Gemiddelde | 29.58% | | Cafe Moro, ronde 5, tafel N-8 |
|---|
| OW tegen J Linse - L Hjalmarsson (195) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 17 | 3  | N | = | 195 | 212 | -140 | 73.0 | 32.59% |
| 18 | 4  | O | = | 195 | 212 | 420 | 73.0 | 32.59% |
| 19 | 3  | N | -2 | 195 | 212 | 100 | 40.7 | 18.17% |
| 20 | 5  | N | = | 195 | 212 | -650 | 79.0 | 35.27% |
| Gemiddelde | 29.66% | | Cafe Smederij, ronde 6, tafel M-6 |
|---|
| OW tegen E Hoeksema - M Romeijn (191) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 21 | 2  | W | +2 | 191 | 212 | 130 | 77.0 | 34.38% |
| 22 | 3 nt | W | -3 | 191 | 212 | -300 | 11.0 | 4.91% |
| 23 | 3  | N | -1 | 191 | 212 | 100 | 47.0 | 20.98% |
| 24 | 2  | W | = | 191 | 212 | 90 | 149.0 | 66.52% |
| Gemiddelde | 31.70% | | Cafe Stadtlander, ronde 7, tafel L-7 |
|---|
| OW tegen R Ottelé - E Pas (187) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 25 | 4  | Z | = | 187 | 212 | -420 | 55.0 | 24.55% |
| 26 | 3 nt | Z | +2 | 187 | 212 | -660 | 39.4 | 17.59% |
| 27 | 5 Dbl | N | -2 | 187 | 212 | 300 | 109.0 | 48.66% |
| 28 | 3  | N | = | 187 | 212 | -110 | 27.5 | 12.28% |
| Gemiddelde | 25.77% | | Cafe Kijff, ronde 8, tafel I-7 |
|---|
| OW tegen A Reicher-schut - R Dijken (183) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 29 | 1 nt | W | -1 | 183 | 212 | -100 | 88.0 | 39.29% |
| 30 | 3 nt | Z | = | 183 | 212 | -400 | 66.0 | 29.46% |
| 31 | 4  | O | -1 | 183 | 212 | -50 | 72.0 | 32.14% |
| 32 | 3  | W | -1 | 183 | 212 | -100 | 181.0 | 80.80% |
| Gemiddelde | 45.42% |